[eml-dev] [Bug 1132] - fix access control rule ambiguities
bugzilla-daemon at ecoinformatics.org
bugzilla-daemon at ecoinformatics.org
Fri Aug 29 15:21:59 PDT 2008
http://bugzilla.ecoinformatics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1132
------- Comment #12 from mob at icess.ucsb.edu 2008-08-29 15:21 -------
Created an attachment (id=190)
--> (http://bugzilla.ecoinformatics.org/attachment.cgi?id=190&action=view)
schema for code, derived PhysicalDistributionType
Code that bug #3480, comment2 is refering to. Access trees could be optionally
included in any distribution element of this type. The <access> element follows
the base type (res:DistributionType) as is required by schema language when
creating derived types.
<xs:complexType name="PhysicalDistributionType">
<xs:complexContent>
<xs:extension base="res:DistributionType">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="access" type="acc:AccessType" minOccurs="0"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:extension>
</xs:complexContent>
</xs:complexType>
More information about the Eml-dev
mailing list