[eml-dev] [Bug 1132] - fix access control rule ambiguities

bugzilla-daemon at ecoinformatics.org bugzilla-daemon at ecoinformatics.org
Fri Aug 29 15:21:59 PDT 2008


http://bugzilla.ecoinformatics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1132





------- Comment #12 from mob at icess.ucsb.edu  2008-08-29 15:21 -------
Created an attachment (id=190)
 --> (http://bugzilla.ecoinformatics.org/attachment.cgi?id=190&action=view)
schema for code, derived PhysicalDistributionType 

Code that bug #3480, comment2 is refering to. Access trees could be optionally
included in any distribution element of this type. The <access> element follows
the base type (res:DistributionType) as is required by schema language when
creating derived types. 

<xs:complexType name="PhysicalDistributionType">
    <xs:complexContent>
      <xs:extension base="res:DistributionType">
        <xs:sequence>
          <xs:element name="access" type="acc:AccessType" minOccurs="0"/>
        </xs:sequence>
      </xs:extension>
    </xs:complexContent>
  </xs:complexType>


More information about the Eml-dev mailing list