[eml-dev] [Bug 3508] - create a stylesheet for EML2.0.x to EML 2.1.0

[bugzilla-daemon at ecoinformatics.org]

http://bugzilla.ecoinformatics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3508





------- Comment #5 from mob at icess.ucsb.edu  2008-10-15 16:56 -------
Created an attachment (id=191)
 --> (http://bugzilla.ecoinformatics.org/attachment.cgi?id=191&action=view)
eml-datasetWithAccessOverride.xml

regarding case 4.2 (from irc)
daigle that is the case that we use in all the test cases for 2.0.1 inline
access
daigle bunches of tests
daigle in fact, that's the only case that I'm positive works :)

So metacat does recognize /dataset/distribution nodes. But there is a variant
of this case that we cannot transform to 2.1.0. If the doc also has access
rules in additionalMetadata that override the /dataset/distribution with
another access tree, then there is no place to move that second access tree.

There might be the possiblity of this action: 
create an otherEntity, with a distribution tree, and copy the access tree from
additonalMetadata to there. This would also require adding a
otherEntity/physical/distribution/references node which referred to
dataset/distribution (who's id attribute would have to be generated if it
didn't exist). All this is possible (although is it advisable?) But the deal
breaker is this: the entity group has some other required elements whose
content we know nothing about. So I think this sub-case falls into the category
of those docs we cannot transform.

In the eml/test directory, see the doc eml-datasetWithAccessOverride.xml, also
attached to this comment. This test is similar to the doc we would be trying to
create.